More legal trouble?

Well they did not give us long to catch our breaths.
Attorney Ging, in behalf of Mary Jo Takacs, filed a Petition for Re-Argument , dated Jan. 19th., in the matter against Indian Lake Borough Zoning Hearing Board, St. Clair Resorts Development, LLC and Indian Lake Borough. This Petition filed with the Commonwealth Court in the matter of their decision on cases 2616 CD 2009 and 365 CD2010. These are the cases on the granting of the permit for the second townhouse and the dismissal for failing to post the bond amount. Basically Attorney Ging tells the Court they erred- just as the Borough, the Zoning Hearing Board, and the Trial Court had before them.
You see, Attorney Ging and his band of merry supporters are correct and the rest of the world is wrong.
Two comments on the article about this in today's Somerset Daily American, http://www.dailyamerican.com/articles/2011/01/22/news/local/news071.txt.
I was in Judge Klemetik's court room during these proceedings. He did not just state that the claim was frivolous but asked Mrs. Takacs 'what part of buying a home next to commercial property did you not understand'. Additionally the judge reduces the amount of the request bond to $380,000, reflecting only the approximate amount of the sale of one townhouse, not the amount of damages done by submittal of these frivolous cases.
We are hoping that that the Commonwealth Court will not grant this Petition, or else here we all go again, spending more of your tax money on court defenses.
Please let your feelings be known, send your comments to me at pcornez@yahoo.com, thank you, I see they get to the parties financing these adventures.